Residential complex "Shushary": will we get apartments? Residential complex "Shushary" from the company "Dalpiterstroy": beyond the distance is currently participating

https://www.site/articles/complaints/zhk-shushary-dozhdemsya-li-kvartir/

Verified personally

2016-11-15 14:41:00

2016-11-15 14:41:00

Vyacheslav Yarnykh

Residential complex "Shushary" from Dalpiterstroy is one of the largest residential areas of the city and, alas, one of the problematic objects. Buyers of apartments in one of the buildings of the complex are included in the register of defrauded equity holders. the site checks whether old and new clients have a chance to wait for housing.

Residential complex "Shushary" from Dalpiterstroy is one of the largest residential areas of the city and, alas, one of the problematic objects. Buyers of apartments in one of the buildings of the complex are included in the register of defrauded equity holders. the site checks whether old and new clients have a chance to wait for housing.

Multi-apartment residential building with built-in and attached premises: building. No. 33.1. Construction began in the third quarter of 2013, completion in the fourth quarter of 2016. Construction permit from August 2, 2013 to November 2, 2016. The deadline for putting the house into operation, according to the project declaration, is the 4th quarter of 2016. At the same time, on the developer’s website, the completion date for this building is defined as the 1st quarter of 2019. There is no information on the construction progress on the website. There is no such information on this building on forums dedicated to the construction of residential complexes. According to Rosreestr data, not a single equity participation mortgage agreement was registered in this building as of November 6, 2016. Perhaps some sales are in installments, for a one-time payment, or contracts are being registered.

Apartments from developers with promotions

Multi-apartment residential buildings with built-in and attached premises and underground parking lots, bldg. 40.1, 40.2, 40.3, 40.4. The start of construction is the 2nd quarter of 2013, the end, according to the initial declaration, is the 4th quarter of 2017. Commissioning is also in the 4th quarter of 2017. Changes in the project declaration delayed the completion of construction and commissioning several times. For example, for buildings 40.2 and 40.3. - for the 2nd quarter of 2018 (that is, the terms were increased by 3 quarters or 9 months). But in the latest changes dated 10/06/2016, the previous deadlines are again indicated, the 4th quarter of 2017. Except for building 40.4, the deadline for completion and commissioning was postponed to the 4th quarter of 2018 (that is, increased by a year). The building permit is valid from June 3, 2013 until October 3, 2017.

Multi-apartment residential building No. 61. Construction began in the second quarter of 2011, completion in the first quarter of 2014. Changes in the project declaration moved the deadline to the 2nd quarter of 2014, then to the 4th quarter of 2014, then to the 4th quarter of 2015. Thus, according to the documents, the completion of construction has been postponed by 1 year and 9 months. Construction permit dated December 13, 2011, extended until April 26, 2014, then extended until November 30, 2015 (extended for 1 year and 7 months). Obtaining permission to put the facility into operation, according to the initial project declaration, Q1 2014, was postponed to Q3 2014, then to Q4 2015. The house was commissioned in July 2016, that is, the delay was more than two years.

Multi-apartment residential building with built-in and attached premises: building 62. Start of construction: 1st quarter of 2013. The building permit is valid from March 18, 2013 to September 18, 2015; changed to December 30, 2015, then to June 30, 2016. Completion of construction and receipt of permission to enter: 3rd quarter of 2015, changed to 4th quarter of 2015, changed to 2nd quarter of 2016. In fact, as of November 2016, construction has not been completed and the house has not been put into operation. Thus, the delay period was 1 year.

Multi-apartment residential building with built-in and attached premises: building 65. Start of construction: I quarter of 2013. The building permit is valid from March 21, 2013 until September 21, 2015; changed until November 30, 2016 (that is, for 1 year and 2 months). Completion of construction: 3rd quarter of 2015; extended until the 4th quarter of 2016. Estimated deadline for obtaining permission to put the facility into operation: 3rd quarter of 2015 changed to 4th quarter of 2016. Presumably, the delay period will be at least 1 year and 3 months.

Multi-apartment residential building with built-in and attached premises: building 66. Start of construction: I quarter of 2013. Construction permit from March 21, 2013 to September 21, 2015. Completion of construction: 3rd quarter of 2015. The estimated completion date for the construction of the house and obtaining permission to put the facility into operation is the 3rd quarter of 2015. No changes that increase the delivery time for this house are specified in the project declarations. However, the developer’s official website lists the completion date as the 4th quarter of 2016.

Multi-apartment residential building: building 68. Start of construction: 2nd quarter of 2014. Construction permit dated April 4, 2014. The validity period of the permit is until December 30, 2014, changed to March 30, 2016, then to December 31, 2016. Completion of construction: 4th quarter of 2014, changed to 1st quarter of 2016. Estimated completion date for the construction of the house and obtaining permission to put the facility into operation: 4th quarter of 2014. Changed to the 1st quarter of 2016, then to the 4th quarter of 2016. As of November 2016, the house had not been delivered, that is, the deadline was delayed by 1 year and 11 months.

Multi-apartment residential building: building 7.1. Start of construction: I quarter of 2013. Construction permit from March 01, 2013 to February 1, 2015, changed to February 1, 2016, then to December 31, 2016. Completion of construction: 1st quarter of 2015, changed to 1st quarter of 2016, then to 4th quarter of 2016. The estimated deadline for obtaining permission to put the facility into operation is the 1st quarter of 2015, changed to the 1st quarter of 2016 and the 4th quarter of 2016. Thus, as of November 2016, the commissioning of a residential building was delayed by more than a year and a half.

Residential buildings: plot 463 bldg. 1, bldg. 2. Start of construction: II quarter of 2011. Construction permit dated May 13, 2011, valid until October 13, 2014, changed to March 30, 2015, then to December 30, 2015, then to July 1, 2016, and to December 31, 2016. The end of construction was changed to the 4th quarter of 2014 to the 1st quarter of 2015, then to the 4th quarter of 2015, then to the 3rd quarter of 2016, then to the 4th quarter of 2016. The estimated completion date for the construction of the house and obtaining permission to put the facility into operation is the 4th quarter of 2014 and has also been changed to the 1st quarter of 2015, the 4th quarter of 2015, the 3rd quarter of 2016, and the 4th quarter of 2016. Thus, as of November 2016, the commissioning of a residential building was delayed by 1 year and 11 months.

It can be stated that the delay in putting objects into operation ranges from a year to more than two years. Such unacceptable deadlines usually characterize construction companies that are in a pre-bankruptcy state.

Bankrupt or not?

But "Dalpiterstroy" is not in a pre-bankruptcy state. If you look at the indicators for the last two years, reflected in the project declarations and amendments to them, you can see that the developer has shown a stable (albeit small) profit throughout this time.

Financial results (profit):

In addition, access to credit and borrowed resources, including the credit resources of OJSC, can serve as an indicator of business stability.

The project declaration for buildings 1 and 2 on plot 463 contains information about the pledge of a land plot with a total area of ​​34,885 sq. m. m., located at the address: St. Petersburg, territory of the Shushary enterprise, plot 463, cadastral No. 78:42:15104:46 in Sberbank OJSC. And also information about the mortgage agreement 2009-2-101612/I-1 dated 05/25/2012, registered by the Office of the Federal Service for State Registration of Cadastre and Cartography in St. Petersburg on 06/27/2012, registration number: 78-78-06/ 019/2012-270, with the attachment of an agreement on opening a non-revolving credit line No. 2009-2-101612 dated 05/25/2012.

It is obvious that Sberbank OJSC does not provide loans to enterprises that are unable to repay them. Access to credit and borrowed funds is also confirmed by the indicators of the developer’s latest reporting as of December 31, 2014, available in the open database on the Rosstat website (in thousands of rubles):

Let's study sales

Although the project declarations and amendments to them indicate that construction is financed through the sale of apartments under construction under Federal Law No. 214, it is obvious that not only funds from shareholders are used. This is confirmed in the following data on LCD cases:

Multi-apartment residential buildings with built-in and attached premises and underground parking lots, bldg. 40.1, 40.2, 40.3, 40.4. The number of apartments in these four buildings, according to the initial project declaration, was 2,160. According to changes in the project declaration dated October 6, 2016, the number of apartments was increased to 2,856 units. As of November 6, 2016, only 116 mortgage agreements for shared participation in these houses were registered in Rosreestr. Most of them occurred in 2016 and only a small part in the middle and end of 2015. Even taking into account apartments purchased by other means (installments, one-time payment) or contracts currently at the registration stage, about 4% of the total number of apartments have been contracted.

Multi-apartment residential building: building No. 61. The number of apartments in this building is 648. Meanwhile, according to Rosreestr, as of November 6, 2016, 22 equity participation mortgage agreements were concluded (mostly in 2016). According to the old cadastral number, there are 10 more contracts (all in 2012). Total: 32 apartments. Keeping in mind purchases paid for in other ways, we get about 5% of apartments sold.

Multi-apartment residential building with built-in and attached premises: building 62. The number of apartments in this building is 868 units. As of November 6, 2016, only 28 mortgage share participation agreements were registered, most of them in 2016, and some in 2015. Based on official figures, we get about 3% of sales of the total number of apartments.

Multi-apartment residential building with built-in and attached premises: building 65. The number of apartments in this building is 335. As of November 6, 2016, only 23 mortgage equity participation agreements were registered. Among them there are contracts for 2014, 2015, and 2016. Thus, the number of concluded equity participation agreements amounted to about 7% of the total number of apartments. There are probably still sales with other payment methods, but the developer does not provide information about them.

Multi-apartment residential building with built-in and attached premises: building 66. The number of apartments in this building is 209 units. As of November 6, 2016, 16 mortgage equity participation agreements were registered. Among them are mainly contracts for 2014, there are a few for 2015 and 2016. Thus, the number of apartments purchased, according to information available in the public domain, amounted to about 7% of the total number.

Multi-apartment residential building: building 68. The number of apartments in the building, according to the initial design declaration, is 390 units. Then changed to 400 pcs. As of November 6, 2016, only 139 equity participation agreements were registered. Among them are several contracts for 2014, the rest for 2015 and 2016. Plus, we remind you about apartments that could be sold in installments, for a one-time payment, or whose DDU are still being registered. But according to official data from Rosstat, the number of apartments purchased was about 35% of the total.

Multi-apartment residential building: building 7.1. The number of apartments according to the project declaration is 648 units. Meanwhile, as of November 6, 2016, only 96 mortgage equity participation agreements were registered. Among them are many contracts for 2014 and 2015, and several for 2016. The number of apartments purchased was about 15% of the total.

Residential buildings: plot 463 bldg. 1, bldg. 2. There are 984 apartments in building No. 1, 517 in building No. 2. Total: 1,501 apartments. Meanwhile, as of November 6, 2016, only 482 equity participation agreements were registered. Among them are contracts for 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016. The number of apartments purchased was about 32% of the total.

It is likely that during the construction of residential complex houses, not only the funds of shareholders, but also other funds were used. The developer has (or previously had) access to credit and debt financing, which confirms his creditworthiness, as well as a good study of the economics of his construction projects. To put it simply, they don’t lend money to a bankrupt person.

Currently, the developer offers discounts of up to 18% of the cost of housing for a one-time payment. This is a very significant discount, which may indicate that now LLC "Dalpiterstroy" needs funds from shareholders to continue the construction of residential complexes. It is obvious that a simple sale of apartments in buildings with a high degree of readiness can provide the necessary funds to complete the construction of the declared residential complex projects. And if significant delays are a very significant disadvantage of this developer, then the potential significant profit that may appear after the sale of these apartments is its advantage.

Courts

The advantages include the accuracy of the developer in financial relationships with contractors. The developer is not involved in any significant legal proceedings that may affect its activities.

And although over the past 3 years against SC "Dalpiterstroy" 4 claims were filed to declare him bankrupt, including in 2016 by Ariel Metal JSC; all these bankruptcy petitions did not reach trial due to withdrawal by the plaintiffs. In particular, for Ariel Metal JSC, the court refused to consider the bankruptcy application due to its withdrawal on July 29, 2016. In other words, the developer solves problems out of court.

In civil proceedings, a significant number of claims by energy supply organizations can be noted. But the amounts that these organizations collected from the developer were miniscule, amounting to several tens of thousands of rubles, which in relation to the volume of this company is simply unnoticeable.

One can also note 24 court proceedings over the last 3 years on administrative fines issued by the State Construction Supervision and Expertise Service of St. Petersburg and the State Administrative and Technical Inspectorate, some of which SC "Dalpiterstroy" won, thereby annulling those fines.

However, the fact remains. For a company that allows delays in the delivery of houses under construction to reach almost 3 years, the number of lawsuits is insignificant. The existing ones are unlikely to affect the results of the activities of this developer. In addition, there are no enforcement proceedings against the developer.

Thus, there is nothing to indicate that the developer SC "Dalpiterstroy" is experiencing critical financial difficulties.

However, such significant delays in the delivery of objects and the constant postponement of their deadlines indicate insufficient funding for construction work. Probably, the developer really doesn’t have enough money for all the projects.

Conclusions

It can be assumed that the developer has recently lost access to debt financing, and therefore at the moment can only rely on the funds of shareholders.

The developer is constructing many objects not only of this residential complex, but also of others. During the crisis, the number of buyers has decreased significantly. The flow of funds from equity holders has decreased, so money from fewer buyers has to be “spread in a thin layer” over the same number of houses that were mortgaged earlier, hence the long-term construction.

Whether the “canopy” of unsold apartments that the developer has will help solve the problems with financing the projects under construction is a big question, since the reputation of the developer is affected by the buyers of apartments in the buildings on plot 463, who are included in the register of defrauded shareholders. Even in buildings with a high degree of readiness, further delays can be expected with the completion of construction and commissioning of buildings.

In the village of Shushary, close to the Ring Road and the Moskovskoye Highway, the Dalpiterstroy company is carrying out large-scale construction of the Shushary residential complex, the buildings of which are located on different streets of the village, but are the same in style and price category.

Residential complexes are brick-monolithic buildings with a height of 10 to 27 floors, quite standard for modern housing construction. Their external walls are lined with ventilated façade systems.

The housing offered in this residential complex belongs to the economy price category. In total, the Dalpiterstroy company plans to build 23 residential buildings and infrastructure facilities in the village, including kindergartens, schools, clinics, underground parking for 130 cars and a shopping and entertainment center.

The developer offers a standard set of planning solutions, in which the smallest living space is a studio, and the largest is a three-room apartment. Studios and one-room apartments have combined bathrooms. There are balconies everywhere. The apartments are rented without finishing.

The environmental situation in Shushary is far from ideal. Three kilometers to the west of it is the runway of Pulkovo Airport, to the east is an automobile plant, and nearby are major highways.

Transport accessibility is satisfactory. Three major highways near the village cope well with the traffic flow. The nearest metro station is Kupchino. It's about two kilometers away.

The information on this page was updated on 09/07/2018. Source - developer’s website, official website of the Shushary residential complex, data recorded from the words of the sales department manager.

Over the past year "Dalpiterstroy" has somewhat improved its position in , although the rating given to the company by experts still remains quite low (“B-”). As for large-scale construction in Shushary, the developer’s progress is progressing, albeit with delays. In 2017, since the last opinion of the portal was written, a number of local buildings were put into operation. For other houses, the completion date was postponed to 2018-2019. Judging by the way things are at the beginning of April 2018, some of these houses can be commissioned according to the new deadlines, while for others there is a possibility of another postponement. Buildings 65 and 66 have advanced the furthest. Externally they are almost ready, interior work is underway in the buildings. The delivery of these houses is quite possible in the coming months. Building 7.1 has also been erected, facade finishing, stained glass, and interior work are underway. The house can also be put into operation this year. For the remaining houses under construction, the situation is as follows. In building 40.1, the top floors are being erected and the external walls are being filled. Installation of windows and finishing of facades has not yet begun. Construction of building 40.2 is carried out at the level of the 13th floor, building 40.3 - at the level of the 15th. In our opinion, the delivery of these three houses in the second quarter of 2018 is in question. There are also serious doubts about the hull 40.4 “Autumn”, which is supposed to be put into operation in the fourth quarter of this year. Currently, construction here is at the level of foundation work and the ground floor. Houses 33.1 and 33.3 are also in the early stages of construction. True, there is still a year before they are delivered, so it is too early to assume anything.

Earlier opinions of the portal have already spoken about the strengths and weaknesses of the residential area being built by Dalpiterstroy in Shushary. Today we can add a few words regarding social infrastructure. It is developing here little by little. Thus, at the end of January in Shushary, four kindergarten groups were opened within the walls of an elementary school, designed for short-term stays. A kindergarten for 200 places is due to open in 2019, which is being built "Dalpiterstroy". In addition, local authorities plan to buy premises from the company in three houses under construction so that they can also open full-day and short-term groups for children. Negotiations are also underway that Dalpiterstroy will build three modular kindergartens in Shushary. In other news, the Lenta supermarket will open soon.

About the residential complex "Shushary" A lot has been written on our portal. All information about the pros and cons of this project is contained in its description and in the portal’s previous opinion. It's difficult to say something new. Unless you once again warn potential buyers: if you “fit” into this project, be prepared to wait for many years for your apartment. The situation here repeats itself from year to year. Some buildings are being delivered with delays, others are being launched and they are also being built more slowly than stated. As of January 2017, about a dozen buildings are under construction, the deadlines for which have been postponed several times. Four houses are planned for delivery this year. All of them, judging by the photo reports, are in a high stage of readiness, and according to the logic of things, it is realistic to deliver them. However, will it be possible to do this in the first quarter as planned? It’s difficult to say: there is little time left and, given the current practice, new transfers cannot be ruled out. On January 30, it became known that the first of four buildings planned for 2017, building No. 68, had been put into operation. Now the developer must also fulfill obligations on buildings No. 62, and No. 463, building 1 and building 2. But nothing will happen to the shareholders of building No. 7.1 this year. Previously (after a number of postponements), the second quarter of 2017 was stated as the deadline for the completion of this house. But, alas, the year has begun, and the deadline was pushed back again - now to the first quarter of 2018. The reason is clear: work on this site is progressing slowly, the monolithic frame of the house is ready, but the filling of the external walls is at most half completed, not to mention the rest of the work. This year, no matter how hard we try, this house cannot be rented out. However, it is disappointing that the unpleasant trend of rescheduling continued into the new year.

The city authorities are aware of the problems of shareholders; meetings are held periodically to review the progress of work in Shushary, but so far this has not led to a radical improvement in the situation. The main reason cited by Dalpiterstroy representatives when explaining the delays in the delivery of objects is the difficult situation amid the crisis: rising construction costs and declining demand for apartments.

The main problems of Shushary, which potential apartment buyers should pay attention to, are social and transport. In social terms, development is gradually progressing; by the end of 2016, the village already has three schools, three kindergartens, a clinic, a police station, and commercial facilities are opening. Recently, plans were announced to build a huge residential complex of one million square meters in Shushary. meters. As part of it, several new schools and kindergartens, sports complexes, and medical centers should appear. Of course, all this will not appear very soon, and yet we can look into the future with cautious optimism. In terms of transport, the expansion of Pushkinskaya and Valdayskaya streets, the extension of the latter to Vitebsky Prospekt and the construction of an interchange there promise to improve the situation. This is planned to be done in 2018. There is also hope for a decrease in the density of traffic flow along the Moscow Highway after the opening of a toll highway between St. Petersburg and Moscow for the World Cup.

Despite delays in delivery deadlines, apartments in the Shushary residential complex are in demand. All the disadvantages are outweighed by the main advantage - the low price. Among the main alternative options, it is also not perfect in terms of meeting deadlines from Leader Group company(rating “B+” in) and the project (rating “A+”) UP-quarter “Moskovsky”. If you don’t want to wait until the house is completed, you can consider options in completed residential complexes from and residential complexes from.

The Shushary microdistrict began to be actively developed 15 years ago. At the moment, it includes several dozen residential buildings, while construction continues. On the instructions of the editors of Novostroy-SPb, the Mystery Shopper went to the microdistrict and found out all the details of the project.

Also on Shkolnaya Street, Leader Group is building the Bosfor residential complex - this is a comfort-class house. It is multi-storey (8-18 floors), built using brick-monolithic technology. Delivery is scheduled for 2018.

The Dobrynya residential complex is being built here in the Lensovetovsky quarter. This is a nine-section economy class house with a height of 5-9 floors. It is being built by the ST+ company using monolithic technology. Stated delivery dates 2018-2019.

On the Pulkovo territory, the Vita insurance company is building the Expograd residential complex. It will consist of three brick-monolithic buildings with a height of 4 floors. The apartments will be delivered in the fourth quarter of 2018 with pre-finishing finishing and glazed balconies.

Prices - 6 out of 10 points

Microdistrict “Shushary” is significantly inferior in price only to the “Dobrynya” residential complex. In other new buildings, the cost of apartments is generally more expensive, but you can find housing in approximately the same price category, even in “comfort” class projects (for example, two-room apartments in the “UP-Moskovsky quarter”).

Ways-roads

Get to the microdistrict. “Shushary” can be reached from the “Sennaya” metro station - minibus K3 will take you there in half an hour if there are no traffic jams. From the Kupchino metro station there is bus 190 and minibus K418. Travel time is 5-7 minutes, again in the absence of traffic jams. But traffic jams happen and are quite impressive. The population of the village of Shushary has reached 66.3 thousand people, and you can enter and exit the village along one single road! This is the main problem of the location. And the roads inside the residential complex are narrow, which is very strange for a new area.

You can also take the train from Vitebsky station (17 minutes travel time) or from the Kupchino metro station (5 minutes). The Shushary railway station is located on the outskirts of the microdistrict, and those who use the train have to walk 10-30 minutes to their home. The Shushary metro station, which is due to open this spring, will be located in an industrial zone at a distance of about five kilometers from residential buildings. Therefore, it will be inconvenient for residents to use it.

By car you can get to Shushary from the Ring Road in 5 minutes. In 15 minutes you can get to the city of Pushkin.

Transport accessibility - 5 out of 10 points

The main problem is that there is only one exit from the microdistrict, which creates severe traffic jams. The railway station is located on the eastern outskirts of the residential complex, which is inconvenient for residents of houses located on the western outskirts. The metro stations “Kupchino” and “Zvezdnaya” are not within walking distance, you need to get to them.

Infrastructure

In front of every house in the microdistrict. "Shushary" has open parking spaces. Also on the Dalpiterstroy website it is stated that four parking lots have been built in Shushary, but in fact only three have been built (on Visherskaya and Pervomaiskaya streets, as well as room 55), the fourth (room 60) is still under construction. Although the manager at the central sales office said by phone that the parking lot at No. 55 has already been put into operation, the documents published on the Dalpiterstroy website do not contain permission to put it into operation. For parking lot no. 60, the old deadline is written on the website (Q3 2017).

Prices for a parking space range from 620 thousand to 850 thousand rubles. Residents of Shushar can also use a paid guarded parking lot. According to the manager, there are places there and they cost 120-130 rubles per day.

Small shops, including chain stores, cafes, salons, a post office, and children's leisure centers are already operating on the ground floors of the buildings in the microdistrict. Dalpiterstroy built two kindergartens for 190 children (the manager said that 350 children attend them), a modern school with a swimming pool for 1,125 students, children's and adult clinics, a multifunctional center and even a church with a Sunday school. There are not enough places in kindergartens, but there are alternative private kindergartens, the cost of which is 2-3 orders of magnitude higher than in public ones. According to the manager, there are still enough places at the school (I couldn’t find any information on the forums about problems with placing children in schools).

In the summer of 2017, a square was opened on Visherskaya Street, named in honor of the 70th anniversary of the Victory. In principle, there is nowhere else to go for a walk with children in Shushary except the courtyards and this park.

Infrastructure - 6 out of 10 points

The pace of residential construction is faster than the pace of construction of social and cultural facilities; there is very little greenery and places for walking in the area.

Resume

To summarize, it is worth noting that the microdistrict. “Shushary” attracts with its low prices, close location to the metro station, the presence of a railway station and the necessary infrastructure. But the location of the complex next to the ring road and two major roads and an industrial zone worsens the ecology of the microdistrict. In addition, the relative proximity of Pulkovo airport creates additional noise. The courtyard areas are not fenced and are minimally landscaped. Apart from courtyards and one small square in Shushary, there are no areas for walking and recreation.

The main problem of the microdistrict. “Shushary” is just one narrow exit towards the center of St. Petersburg. They have been trying to solve this problem for a long time, but nothing has changed yet. In addition, the streets themselves inside the block are also narrow.

The second big disadvantage of the microdistrict is the significant delays in the delivery of houses. Therefore, those planning to buy their first home should allow more waiting time. New building microdistrict "Shushary" by the sum of factors receives 6 points.