The Shushary microdistrict began to be actively developed 15 years ago. At the moment, it includes several dozen residential buildings, while construction continues. On the instructions of the editors of Novostroy-SPb, the Mystery Shopper went to the microdistrict and found out all the details of the project.
Also on Shkolnaya Street, Leader Group is building the Bosfor residential complex - this is a comfort-class house. It is multi-storey (8-18 floors), built using brick-monolithic technology. Delivery is scheduled for 2018.
The Dobrynya residential complex is being built here in the Lensovetovsky quarter. This is a nine-section economy class house with a height of 5-9 floors. It is being built by the ST+ company using monolithic technology. Stated delivery dates 2018-2019.
| Housing type | Footage, sq. m | Price, rub. | Price per sq. m, rub. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 room | from 33.5 | from 1 873 320 | from 55 920 |
| 2-room | from 55.5 | from 3 131 328 | from 56 420 |
| 3-room | from 78.8 | from 4 016 250 | from 50 967 |
| studios | from 25.3 | from 1 441 530 | from 56 977 |
On the Pulkovo territory, the Vita insurance company is building the Expograd residential complex. It will consist of three brick-monolithic buildings with a height of 4 floors. The apartments will be delivered in the fourth quarter of 2018 with pre-finishing finishing and glazed balconies.
| Housing type | Footage, sq. m | Price, rub. | Price per sq. m, rub. |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 room | from 28.6 | from 2,059,200 | from 72 000 |
| 2-room | from 43.1 | from 2 973 900 | from 69 000 |
| 3-room | from 60.3 | from 4 040 100 | from 67 000 |
| 4-room | from 101.3 | from 6 787 100 | from 67 000 |
| studios | from 19.7 | from 1 497 200 | from 76 000 |
Prices - 6 out of 10 points
Microdistrict “Shushary” is significantly inferior in price only to the “Dobrynya” residential complex. In other new buildings, the cost of apartments is generally more expensive, but you can find housing in approximately the same price category, even in “comfort” class projects (for example, two-room apartments in the “UP-Moskovsky quarter”).
Ways-roads
Get to the microdistrict. “Shushary” can be reached from the “Sennaya” metro station - minibus K3 will take you there in half an hour if there are no traffic jams. From the Kupchino metro station there is bus 190 and minibus K418. Travel time is 5-7 minutes, again in the absence of traffic jams. But traffic jams happen and are quite impressive. The population of the village of Shushary has reached 66.3 thousand people, and you can enter and exit the village along one single road! This is the main problem of the location. And the roads inside the residential complex are narrow, which is very strange for a new area.
You can also take the train from Vitebsky station (17 minutes travel time) or from the Kupchino metro station (5 minutes). The Shushary railway station is located on the outskirts of the microdistrict, and those who use the train have to walk 10-30 minutes to their home. The Shushary metro station, which is due to open this spring, will be located in an industrial zone at a distance of about five kilometers from residential buildings. Therefore, it will be inconvenient for residents to use it.
By car you can get to Shushary from the Ring Road in 5 minutes. In 15 minutes you can get to the city of Pushkin.
Transport accessibility - 5 out of 10 points
The main problem is that there is only one exit from the microdistrict, which creates severe traffic jams. The railway station is located on the eastern outskirts of the residential complex, which is inconvenient for residents of houses located on the western outskirts. The metro stations “Kupchino” and “Zvezdnaya” are not within walking distance, you need to get to them.
Infrastructure
In front of every house in the microdistrict. "Shushary" has open parking spaces. Also on the Dalpiterstroy website it is stated that four parking lots have been built in Shushary, but in fact only three have been built (on Visherskaya and Pervomaiskaya streets, as well as room 55), the fourth (room 60) is still under construction. Although the manager at the central sales office said by phone that the parking lot at No. 55 has already been put into operation, the documents published on the Dalpiterstroy website do not contain permission to put it into operation. For parking lot no. 60, the old deadline is written on the website (Q3 2017).
Prices for a parking space range from 620 thousand to 850 thousand rubles. Residents of Shushar can also use a paid guarded parking lot. According to the manager, there are places there and they cost 120-130 rubles per day.
Small shops, including chain stores, cafes, salons, a post office, and children's leisure centers are already operating on the ground floors of the buildings in the microdistrict. Dalpiterstroy built two kindergartens for 190 children (the manager said that 350 children attend them), a modern school with a swimming pool for 1,125 students, children's and adult clinics, a multifunctional center and even a church with a Sunday school. There are not enough places in kindergartens, but there are alternative private kindergartens, the cost of which is 2-3 orders of magnitude higher than in public ones. According to the manager, there are still enough places at the school (I couldn’t find any information on the forums about problems with placing children in schools).
In the summer of 2017, a square was opened on Visherskaya Street, named in honor of the 70th anniversary of the Victory. In principle, there is nowhere else to go for a walk with children in Shushary except the courtyards and this park.
Infrastructure - 6 out of 10 points
The pace of residential construction is faster than the pace of construction of social and cultural facilities; there is very little greenery and places for walking in the area.
Resume
To summarize, it is worth noting that the microdistrict. “Shushary” attracts with its low prices, close location to the metro station, the presence of a railway station and the necessary infrastructure. But the location of the complex next to the ring road and two major roads and an industrial zone worsens the ecology of the microdistrict. In addition, the relative proximity of Pulkovo airport creates additional noise. The courtyard areas are not fenced and are minimally landscaped. Apart from courtyards and one small square in Shushary, there are no areas for walking and recreation.
The main problem of the microdistrict. “Shushary” is just one narrow exit towards the center of St. Petersburg. They have been trying to solve this problem for a long time, but nothing has changed yet. In addition, the streets themselves inside the block are also narrow.
The second big disadvantage of the microdistrict is the significant delays in the delivery of houses. Therefore, those planning to buy their first home should allow more waiting time. New building microdistrict "Shushary" by the sum of factors receives 6 points.
Publication date March 12, 2018https://www.site/articles/complaints/zhk-shushary-dozhdemsya-li-kvartir/
Verified personally
2016-11-15 14:41:00
2016-11-15 14:41:00
Vyacheslav Yarnykh
Residential complex "Shushary" from Dalpiterstroy is one of the largest residential areas of the city and, alas, one of the problematic objects. Buyers of apartments in one of the buildings of the complex are included in the register of defrauded equity holders. the site checks whether old and new clients have a chance to wait for housing.
Residential complex "Shushary" from Dalpiterstroy is one of the largest residential areas of the city and, alas, one of the problematic objects. Buyers of apartments in one of the buildings of the complex are included in the register of defrauded equity holders. the site checks whether old and new clients have a chance to wait for housing.
Multi-apartment residential building with built-in and attached premises: building. No. 33.1. Construction began in the third quarter of 2013, completion in the fourth quarter of 2016. Construction permit from August 2, 2013 to November 2, 2016. The deadline for putting the house into operation, according to the project declaration, is the 4th quarter of 2016. At the same time, on the developer’s website, the completion date for this building is defined as the 1st quarter of 2019. There is no information on the construction progress on the website. There is no such information on this building on forums dedicated to the construction of residential complexes. According to Rosreestr data, not a single equity participation mortgage agreement was registered in this building as of November 6, 2016. Perhaps some sales are in installments, for a one-time payment, or contracts are being registered.
Apartments from developers with promotions
Multi-apartment residential buildings with built-in and attached premises and underground parking lots, bldg. 40.1, 40.2, 40.3, 40.4. The start of construction is the 2nd quarter of 2013, the end, according to the initial declaration, is the 4th quarter of 2017. Commissioning is also in the 4th quarter of 2017. Changes in the project declaration delayed the completion of construction and commissioning several times. For example, for buildings 40.2 and 40.3. - for the 2nd quarter of 2018 (that is, the terms were increased by 3 quarters or 9 months). But in the latest changes dated 10/06/2016, the previous deadlines are again indicated, the 4th quarter of 2017. Except for building 40.4, the deadline for completion and commissioning was postponed to the 4th quarter of 2018 (that is, increased by a year). The building permit is valid from June 3, 2013 until October 3, 2017.
Multi-apartment residential building No. 61. Construction began in the second quarter of 2011, completion in the first quarter of 2014. Changes in the project declaration moved the deadline to the 2nd quarter of 2014, then to the 4th quarter of 2014, then to the 4th quarter of 2015. Thus, according to the documents, the completion of construction has been postponed by 1 year and 9 months. Construction permit dated December 13, 2011, extended until April 26, 2014, then extended until November 30, 2015 (extended for 1 year and 7 months). Obtaining permission to put the facility into operation, according to the initial project declaration, Q1 2014, was postponed to Q3 2014, then to Q4 2015. The house was commissioned in July 2016, that is, the delay was more than two years.
Multi-apartment residential building with built-in and attached premises: building 62. Start of construction: 1st quarter of 2013. The building permit is valid from March 18, 2013 to September 18, 2015; changed to December 30, 2015, then to June 30, 2016. Completion of construction and receipt of permission to enter: 3rd quarter of 2015, changed to 4th quarter of 2015, changed to 2nd quarter of 2016. In fact, as of November 2016, construction has not been completed and the house has not been put into operation. Thus, the delay period was 1 year.
Multi-apartment residential building with built-in and attached premises: building 65. Start of construction: I quarter of 2013. The building permit is valid from March 21, 2013 until September 21, 2015; changed until November 30, 2016 (that is, for 1 year and 2 months). Completion of construction: 3rd quarter of 2015; extended until the 4th quarter of 2016. Estimated deadline for obtaining permission to put the facility into operation: 3rd quarter of 2015 changed to 4th quarter of 2016. Presumably, the delay period will be at least 1 year and 3 months.
Multi-apartment residential building with built-in and attached premises: building 66. Start of construction: I quarter of 2013. Construction permit from March 21, 2013 to September 21, 2015. Completion of construction: 3rd quarter of 2015. The estimated completion date for the construction of the house and obtaining permission to put the facility into operation is the 3rd quarter of 2015. No changes that increase the delivery time for this house are specified in the project declarations. However, the developer’s official website lists the completion date as the 4th quarter of 2016.
Multi-apartment residential building: building 68. Start of construction: 2nd quarter of 2014. Construction permit dated April 4, 2014. The validity period of the permit is until December 30, 2014, changed to March 30, 2016, then to December 31, 2016. Completion of construction: 4th quarter of 2014, changed to 1st quarter of 2016. Estimated completion date for the construction of the house and obtaining permission to put the facility into operation: 4th quarter of 2014. Changed to the 1st quarter of 2016, then to the 4th quarter of 2016. As of November 2016, the house had not been delivered, that is, the deadline was delayed by 1 year and 11 months.
Multi-apartment residential building: building 7.1. Start of construction: I quarter of 2013. Construction permit from March 01, 2013 to February 1, 2015, changed to February 1, 2016, then to December 31, 2016. Completion of construction: 1st quarter of 2015, changed to 1st quarter of 2016, then to 4th quarter of 2016. The estimated deadline for obtaining permission to put the facility into operation is the 1st quarter of 2015, changed to the 1st quarter of 2016 and the 4th quarter of 2016. Thus, as of November 2016, the commissioning of a residential building was delayed by more than a year and a half.
Residential buildings: plot 463 bldg. 1, bldg. 2. Start of construction: II quarter of 2011. Construction permit dated May 13, 2011, valid until October 13, 2014, changed to March 30, 2015, then to December 30, 2015, then to July 1, 2016, and to December 31, 2016. The end of construction was changed to the 4th quarter of 2014 to the 1st quarter of 2015, then to the 4th quarter of 2015, then to the 3rd quarter of 2016, then to the 4th quarter of 2016. The estimated completion date for the construction of the house and obtaining permission to put the facility into operation is the 4th quarter of 2014 and has also been changed to the 1st quarter of 2015, the 4th quarter of 2015, the 3rd quarter of 2016, and the 4th quarter of 2016. Thus, as of November 2016, the commissioning of a residential building was delayed by 1 year and 11 months.
It can be stated that the delay in putting objects into operation ranges from a year to more than two years. Such unacceptable deadlines usually characterize construction companies that are in a pre-bankruptcy state.
Bankrupt or not?
But "Dalpiterstroy" is not in a pre-bankruptcy state. If you look at the indicators for the last two years, reflected in the project declarations and amendments to them, you can see that the developer has shown a stable (albeit small) profit throughout this time.
Financial results (profit):
| Profit: | |
| As of Q2 2013 | RUB 19,732,000 |
| As of Q4 2013 | RUB 70,775,000 |
| As of Q1 2014 | RUB 11,960,000 |
| As of Q3 2014 | RUB 18,147,000 |
| As of 4th quarter 2014 | RUB 94,097,000 |
| As of Q1 2015 | RUB 5,758,000 |
| As of Q2 2015 | RUB 11,471,000 |
| As of Q3 2015 | RUB 9,744,000 |
| As of March 31, 2016 | RUB 47,595,000 |
| As of 04/29/2016 | RUB 5,504,000 |
| As of 08/01/2016 | RUB 12,649,000 |
In addition, access to credit and borrowed resources, including the credit resources of OJSC, can serve as an indicator of business stability.
The project declaration for buildings 1 and 2 on plot 463 contains information about the pledge of a land plot with a total area of 34,885 sq. m. m., located at the address: St. Petersburg, territory of the Shushary enterprise, plot 463, cadastral No. 78:42:15104:46 in Sberbank OJSC. And also information about the mortgage agreement 2009-2-101612/I-1 dated 05/25/2012, registered by the Office of the Federal Service for State Registration of Cadastre and Cartography in St. Petersburg on 06/27/2012, registration number: 78-78-06/ 019/2012-270, with the attachment of an agreement on opening a non-revolving credit line No. 2009-2-101612 dated 05/25/2012.
It is obvious that Sberbank OJSC does not provide loans to enterprises that are unable to repay them. Access to credit and borrowed funds is also confirmed by the indicators of the developer’s latest reporting as of December 31, 2014, available in the open database on the Rosstat website (in thousands of rubles):
| Name | Meaning | Name (at the end of the reporting year) | Meaning |
| Fixed assets at the end of the reporting year | 467 332 | Other long-term liabilities | 8 255 925 |
| Financial investments at the end of the reporting year | 104 024 | Total long-term liabilities | 9 814 286 |
| Non-current assets at the end of the reporting year* | 15 859 031 | Short-term accounts payable | 3 377 226 |
| Interest payable for the reporting year | 129 964 | Other current liabilities | 8 349 302 |
| Inventories at the end of the reporting year | 1 618 188 | Other income | 687 999 |
| Accounts receivable at the end of the reporting year | 3 442 831 | Other expenses | 766 222 |
| Long-term borrowed funds at the end of the reporting year | 1 558 361 | Revenue | 2 951 700 |
| Short-term borrowed funds at the end of the reporting year | 521 624 | Net profit | 94 097 |
Let's study sales
Although the project declarations and amendments to them indicate that construction is financed through the sale of apartments under construction under Federal Law No. 214, it is obvious that not only funds from shareholders are used. This is confirmed in the following data on LCD cases:
Multi-apartment residential buildings with built-in and attached premises and underground parking lots, bldg. 40.1, 40.2, 40.3, 40.4. The number of apartments in these four buildings, according to the initial project declaration, was 2,160. According to changes in the project declaration dated October 6, 2016, the number of apartments was increased to 2,856 units. As of November 6, 2016, only 116 mortgage agreements for shared participation in these houses were registered in Rosreestr. Most of them occurred in 2016 and only a small part in the middle and end of 2015. Even taking into account apartments purchased by other means (installments, one-time payment) or contracts currently at the registration stage, about 4% of the total number of apartments have been contracted.
Multi-apartment residential building: building No. 61. The number of apartments in this building is 648. Meanwhile, according to Rosreestr, as of November 6, 2016, 22 equity participation mortgage agreements were concluded (mostly in 2016). According to the old cadastral number, there are 10 more contracts (all in 2012). Total: 32 apartments. Keeping in mind purchases paid for in other ways, we get about 5% of apartments sold.
Multi-apartment residential building with built-in and attached premises: building 62. The number of apartments in this building is 868 units. As of November 6, 2016, only 28 mortgage share participation agreements were registered, most of them in 2016, and some in 2015. Based on official figures, we get about 3% of sales of the total number of apartments.
Multi-apartment residential building with built-in and attached premises: building 65. The number of apartments in this building is 335. As of November 6, 2016, only 23 mortgage equity participation agreements were registered. Among them there are contracts for 2014, 2015, and 2016. Thus, the number of concluded equity participation agreements amounted to about 7% of the total number of apartments. There are probably still sales with other payment methods, but the developer does not provide information about them.
Multi-apartment residential building with built-in and attached premises: building 66. The number of apartments in this building is 209 units. As of November 6, 2016, 16 mortgage equity participation agreements were registered. Among them are mainly contracts for 2014, there are a few for 2015 and 2016. Thus, the number of apartments purchased, according to information available in the public domain, amounted to about 7% of the total number.
Multi-apartment residential building: building 68. The number of apartments in the building, according to the initial design declaration, is 390 units. Then changed to 400 pcs. As of November 6, 2016, only 139 equity participation agreements were registered. Among them are several contracts for 2014, the rest for 2015 and 2016. Plus, we remind you about apartments that could be sold in installments, for a one-time payment, or whose DDU are still being registered. But according to official data from Rosstat, the number of apartments purchased was about 35% of the total.
Multi-apartment residential building: building 7.1. The number of apartments according to the project declaration is 648 units. Meanwhile, as of November 6, 2016, only 96 mortgage equity participation agreements were registered. Among them are many contracts for 2014 and 2015, and several for 2016. The number of apartments purchased was about 15% of the total.
Residential buildings: plot 463 bldg. 1, bldg. 2. There are 984 apartments in building No. 1, 517 in building No. 2. Total: 1,501 apartments. Meanwhile, as of November 6, 2016, only 482 equity participation agreements were registered. Among them are contracts for 2012, 2013, 2014, 2015 and 2016. The number of apartments purchased was about 32% of the total.
It is likely that during the construction of residential complex houses, not only the funds of shareholders, but also other funds were used. The developer has (or previously had) access to credit and debt financing, which confirms his creditworthiness, as well as a good study of the economics of his construction projects. To put it simply, they don’t lend money to a bankrupt person.
Currently, the developer offers discounts of up to 18% of the cost of housing for a one-time payment. This is a very significant discount, which may indicate that now LLC "Dalpiterstroy" needs funds from shareholders to continue the construction of residential complexes. It is obvious that a simple sale of apartments in buildings with a high degree of readiness can provide the necessary funds to complete the construction of the declared residential complex projects. And if significant delays are a very significant disadvantage of this developer, then the potential significant profit that may appear after the sale of these apartments is its advantage.
Courts
The advantages include the accuracy of the developer in financial relationships with contractors. The developer is not involved in any significant legal proceedings that may affect its activities.
And although over the past 3 years against SC "Dalpiterstroy" 4 claims were filed to declare him bankrupt, including in 2016 by Ariel Metal JSC; all these bankruptcy petitions did not reach trial due to withdrawal by the plaintiffs. In particular, for Ariel Metal JSC, the court refused to consider the bankruptcy application due to its withdrawal on July 29, 2016. In other words, the developer solves problems out of court.
In civil proceedings, a significant number of claims by energy supply organizations can be noted. But the amounts that these organizations collected from the developer were miniscule, amounting to several tens of thousands of rubles, which in relation to the volume of this company is simply unnoticeable.
One can also note 24 court proceedings over the last 3 years on administrative fines issued by the State Construction Supervision and Expertise Service of St. Petersburg and the State Administrative and Technical Inspectorate, some of which SC "Dalpiterstroy" won, thereby annulling those fines.
However, the fact remains. For a company that allows delays in the delivery of houses under construction to reach almost 3 years, the number of lawsuits is insignificant. The existing ones are unlikely to affect the results of the activities of this developer. In addition, there are no enforcement proceedings against the developer.
Thus, there is nothing to indicate that the developer SC "Dalpiterstroy" is experiencing critical financial difficulties.
However, such significant delays in the delivery of objects and the constant postponement of their deadlines indicate insufficient funding for construction work. Probably, the developer really doesn’t have enough money for all the projects.
Conclusions
It can be assumed that the developer has recently lost access to debt financing, and therefore at the moment can only rely on the funds of shareholders.
The developer is constructing many objects not only of this residential complex, but also of others. During the crisis, the number of buyers has decreased significantly. The flow of funds from equity holders has decreased, so money from fewer buyers has to be “spread in a thin layer” over the same number of houses that were mortgaged earlier, hence the long-term construction.
Whether the “canopy” of unsold apartments that the developer has will help solve the problems with financing the projects under construction is a big question, since the reputation of the developer is affected by the buyers of apartments in the buildings on plot 463, who are included in the register of defrauded shareholders. Even in buildings with a high degree of readiness, further delays can be expected with the completion of construction and commissioning of buildings.
Real estate in the standard class residential complex "Shushary" under construction in the Pushkinsky district of St. Petersburg has an obscenely low price tag. The developer, the Dalpiterstroy construction corporation, is building an entire block here, which will have its own social and cultural facilities, landscaping and landscaping, which, by the way, are so lacking in this location. What is the secret of pricing from IC "Dalpiterstroy" and what pitfalls can buyers encounter in this case - we will tell you in detail below.
The cost of apartments in more than 20 monolithic buildings starts at 1.7 million rubles. Of the neighbors, such “chocolate” offers are perhaps only available in the Bosphorus residential complex from Leader Group. However, Bosphorus 2.2 million rubles. are significantly inferior to the price tag of the Shushary residential complex. What's the secret? The fact is that the developer works closely with the Administration of St. Petersburg, selling it housing at affordable prices for those on the waiting list and beneficiaries. State payments, of course, cannot be too large, but in return the developer receives a “green light” in many matters.
If you compare Dalpiterstroy with the activities of nosy discount companies that also sell real estate at a reduced cost, there will still be a difference. After all, in this case the developer is fully responsible for all his objects himself, and does not disappear if something happens. Discounters will sell you an apartment for good money, but they participate in construction only as a contractor, and the demand does not hit them in the face.
LLC "Dalpiterstroy" is ready to bear responsibility for its "jambs", of which, in the case of "Shushary", many have been made since the start of construction in 2013. The most annoying thing is the delay in delivery of the property, which spoiled a lot of nerves for the shareholders. For example, the receipt of RVE for buildings No. 1 and No. 2 on site No. 463, scheduled for the fourth quarter of 2013, dates back only to the second quarter of 2017; and building No. 40.2 will (if it is, of course) be put into operation in the second quarter of 2020 instead of the same fourth quarter of 2013. Agree that this is no longer a delay, but a real long-term construction.
To be fair, we note that "Dalpiterstroy" is responsible for all overdue dates and famously pays penalties to shareholders, and those filing regular lawsuits against him to declare bankrupt the State Unitary Enterprise "TEK SPb", LLC "Energy Technologies Innovation Group" (the latter are associated with Lenenergo and LOESK) respond with settlement agreements and repayment of millions of debts.
Well, for Mr. Skorov, who has headed the company since 1998, it’s probably not a problem for him to transfer millions back and forth. Indeed, according to the “DP Billionaires Rating”, as of today, since 2015, his fortune has grown from 4 billion rubles to 19.4 billion rubles. The Alkho crushed stone quarry, of which he is a shareholder, is unlikely to yield such a profit, but Dalpromsintez’s eight oil wells will.
Affordable "a lot" or expensive exclusive
The project itself provides for the construction of an entire residential microdistrict in the south of St. Petersburg. If you look closely at the location map, you can see how dense the buildings are here. Residential complexes "House on Shkolnaya", "Aerocity", "UP-Moskovsky Quarter" surround "Shushary" in a tight ring.
Transport accessibility is generally quite good. Close proximity to St. Petersburg, city registration - all these are big advantages of the Shushary project. Motorists can take advantage of the convenient junction of the Moscow and Vitebsk highways, which is located nearby. If you need to fly, Pulkovo Airport is a 20-minute drive away.
Pedestrians will be able to resort to the services of the railway - the Shushary station is located 500 m from the complex. The event was the long-awaited opening in October 2019 of the Shushary metro station, the terminus of the Frunzensko-Primorskaya (Fifth) line. Of course, it will take about a kilometer to get to it from section No. 463, and even more from section No. 68. However, you can choose from the stations "Kupchino" and "Zvezdnaya", so there is an alternative in this case.
In terms of architectural solutions, the houses of the Shushary residential complex are not particularly exclusive. Many shareholders note rather ascetic facades, although ventilated, have boring colors with occasional inserts of yellow, terracotta, and blue. In response to this, the developer decorated some of the blank facades with ornate mosaics in the form of sailboats or cartoon characters. The number of storeys in the buildings is gradually increasing - starting from 10, by the end of construction the houses should “grow” to 25 levels.
Eat, travel and store
The microdistrict is building its own infrastructure, which in this case will come in handy. The population of the village of Shushary is growing by leaps and bounds, and from 22.6 thousand people in 2010, in 2019 it increased to 84.9 thousand people! The reason lies in the economic specialization of the region, where the main industries are such key areas for human life as the automotive industry, logistics and food processing. Industrial giants “Suzuki”, “MAN”, “Toyota”, “General Motors”, “Scania” and other famous manufacturers operate on the territory of the intra-city municipality.
By the way, about names. The world-famous brands Coca-Cola and Procter&Gamble also conduct active production activities here. So local residents don’t have to complain about the lack of jobs.
In the midst of such high industrial density, the need for social facilities naturally increases. On the territory of the village itself there are two schools - No. 93 and 459, and several kindergartens. In the future, there is also the construction of municipal schools and preschool educational institutions, however, this is all a drop in the ocean.
Naturally, residential complexes being built at an active pace are making their contribution to the social infrastructure. “Shushary” is not lagging behind in this regard. The project provides for the construction of 7 kindergartens and 3 schools, its own clinic, a shopping center, which will have a swimming pool and underground parking for 130 cars. The latter in the Shushary residential complex will be replaced by two parking lots. Although they will be guarded, they are still not the underground, where it is dry and warm . The parking situation here is difficult, because local parking lots cannot accommodate everyone.
You will find other commercial outlets and consumer services on the lower floors of the buildings. In addition, there are chain markets nearby, such as “Dixie”, “Semya”, “Lenta”.
The ecological background of the location cannot be considered the cleanest. In addition to the fact that there are no special green areas and parks, the Ring Road runs less than a kilometer away. Therefore, noise and gas pollution take place. In addition, traffic jams during rush hour have not been canceled - there is only one exit into the city.
Housing issue
The developer rents out the housing stock both without any finishing work at all, or with pre-finishing and final finishing. The choice is up to the buyers. A special feature is the presence of a balcony in each apartment, which significantly increases the usable area.
The layouts of 1-, 2- and 3-room apartments, as well as studios, are distinguished by thoughtful laconicism. You will not find complex geometric fantasies or elaborate French balconies here. All apartments are predominantly single-room apartments, with some corner apartments.
One-room apartments have an average size of 32-42 square meters. m. There are very small kitchenettes, 8.2 sq. m. m, for example, and there are luxurious, 14-meter ones. The two-room apartments have separate bathrooms and quite good corridors, exceeding 10 square meters. m. Three-room apartments come with guest bathrooms, the footage of such premises is 80.3-84 sq. m. m.
The elevator equipment of the Shcherbinsky plant will lift you to the floors. MOPs have concierges and video surveillance. The doors in the entrances are metal, the area is not fenced, but there is security.
Maintenance of the complex is carried out by Management Company No. 1 "Tekhnoprak", for which there are no particular complaints from residents. But there are complaints about the quality of construction work from Dalpiterstroy. Thus, residents of houses on the street could not wait for the storm sewer to be repaired. Valdai, in the basements of which it was damp and fungus began to grow. There are also dissatisfied with the way the developer reacts to comments and gets in touch with its customers.
In general, the budget housing option with St. Petersburg registration suits many. The cost varies in the range of 1.7-5.8 million rubles. Buying today is possible both on the primary market and on the secondary market. Of course, while the house is being built, you can buy it most profitably; after commissioning, the price will rise significantly. However, it is not a fact that they will deliver on time, so see for yourself what is your priority - finances or a restful sleep.
PROS
very good price;
availability of own infrastructure facilities;
St. Petersburg registration;
monolithic houses;
convenient trips to the city;
the complex is mostly completed;
CONS
constant delays in the delivery of buildings;
low quality of construction;
high building density;
The environment leaves much to be desired.
Editorial Conclusion
The Shushary residential complex is interesting, first of all, for its prices. For this, many shareholders are loyal to the lack of punctuality of Dalpiterstroy, which allows itself to delay construction deadlines for several years. The area is developing and is attractive due to the presence of jobs. The other side of the coin is the lack of a sufficient number of social facilities, congested roads, and poor ecology. But, given that registration here is urban, and St. Petersburg can be reached by road and rail, many working in the Northern capital do not mind dropping anchor here.
The Shushary 40 k. 1 residential complex is a monolithic building, designed in a laconic modern style. The developer "Dalpiterstroy" decorated the facade of the building with bright color inserts, which harmonize perfectly with the overall light background of the house. The residential complex has 17 floors.
Apartments and finishing in the residential complex "Shushary 40 k. 1"
The developer offers a choice of studio apartments, one/two/three-room options in the residential complex. The total number of residential premises is 480 apartments, of which the majority are studios and one-room apartments - 368 apartments. There are 64 two-room apartments, and 48 three-room apartments. All residential premises require a balcony, double-glazed windows, Internet, telephone and television. The developer offers apartments without finishing.
Infrastructure and improvement of the residential complex "Shushary 40 k. 1"
The infrastructure of the village of Shushary is developing rapidly. The settlement already has two kindergartens, an educational school, clinics, a pharmacy and other socially important facilities. In addition, the sports sector is well developed in Shushary; there is a football field and many sports grounds, including basketball.
The Dalpiterstroy company undertakes to improve the local area: landscaping, children's playground, asphalt roads and sidewalks, recreation area, installation of special gymnastic and play equipment and exercise equipment.
The residential complex plans to have underground parking for 60 cars with an area of 3,180.5 sq.m.
Transport accessibility of the residential complex "Shushary 40 k. 1"
The ring road is located 600 meters from the residential complex. In addition, the train from Vitebsky Station will reach its destination in 20 minutes.
There are many buses and minibuses running from the Kupchino metro station (buses - 196, 179, 192; minibuses - K410, K688, K287, K292, etc.).
Deadline for completion of the residential complex "Shushary 40 k. 1"
In accordance with the project declaration, the developer plans to complete construction of the complex in the 4th quarter of 2017.
Agreement and opening of sales in the residential complex “Shushary 40 k. 1”
"Dalpiterstroy" launched sales in the residential complex "Shushary 40 k. 1" in the village of Shushary, Pushkinsky district. The company sells apartments in the complex under equity participation agreements (DPA), within the framework of Federal Law No. 214.
